Before copy trading, I honestly thought a 90% win rate meant “safe”. I was so wrong 😂. I used to filter by the highest win rate and assumed that automatically meant low risk. What I didn’t understand is that some strategies win small many times and then lose HUGE once, and a 60–65% win rate with decent risk control can actually be safer than 90% with martingale.
What I wish I knew earlier is that position size and stop loss matter more than win rate, and that profit factor plus drawdown tell a better story than just “number of wins”. A trader who accepts small losses calmly is often more reliable than one who “never” loses… until the whole account explodes. If you’re picking someone to copy, don’t chase 99% win rate – look at how they lose, not only how they win.
风险提示：本文所述仅代表作者个人观点，不代表 Followme 的官方立场。Followme 不对内容的准确性、完整性或可靠性作出任何保证，对于基于该内容所采取的任何行为，不承担任何责任，除非另有书面明确说明。
喜欢的话，赞赏支持一下
暂无评论，立马抢沙发