Amid recent turbulence in Malaysian financial markets, Mr. Lim Meng Hoong raises a provocative question: with the ringgit appreciating, trade surpluses expanding, and stock indices stable, why do inflation and consumer behavior remain cautious? Is this the eve of a true recovery, or are asset prices being prematurely mispriced? He argues that the current macro landscape in Malaysia should not be judged by a single indicator, but through three threads: the “source of variables,” “policy pathways,” and “market pricing.”
Is the Exchange Rate Driven by Trade Repair or a Capital Mirage? Lim Presents Distributional Reasoning
The ringgit has strengthened steadily over the past year, and trade surpluses have widened, seemingly signaling “economic strength and a rebound in international positioning.” But Mr. Lim first challenges this logic: is the ringgit appreciation due to interest rate differentials, or to export recovery and capital flows? If appreciation is mainly export-driven, it is part of an external demand cycle, not a monetary policy triumph.
Thus, he treats the exchange rate not as a directional bet, but as a distribution management issue. Mr. Lim suggests selling USD call options, layering knock-out clauses and calendar structures, and using NDF—onshore forward basis as a rebalancing signal, so that “time value” rather than “trend prediction” becomes the source of returns. If US stocks correct and the dollar strengthens in the short term, he reduces directional exposure rather than doubling down. “Predicting exchange rate levels is less effective than managing exchange rate uncertainty”—this is the core insight by Mr. Lim on FX reasoning.
Mild Inflation Does not Mean Stability: Policy Lags and Curve Dislocations
The Malaysian CPI appears mild year-on-year, with a slight month-on-month uptick. However, Lim stresses the need to understand the “structure of inflation.” With import growth driving up costs and consumer demand lagging, the central bank decision to keep rates unchanged indicates a preference for flexibility over expansion.
This structural lag shows up in the yield curve: the short end is anchored by policy, while the long end is more sensitive to growth and fiscal stimulus expectations. Lim does not bet on “rate cuts” or “tightening,” but focuses on term premia within the curve. He points out that, compared to single rate decisions, the slope differences between 2s10s and 5s10s are more worth trading:
If quarter-end repo rates rise and fiscal bond issuance increases, the curve is likely to steepen;
If import-driven inflation emerges early but the long end hesitates on growth, the curve could “twist and flatten.”
In this environment, directional bond longs are riskier than structural spread trades. Lim emphasizes: rather than waiting for policy, trade the dislocations caused by policy lags in advance.
Why Has Trade Recovery Not Led to a Broad Bull Market?
Trade improvements are often seen as bullish for equities, but Lim notes that Malaysian stocks currently show a “stable index, narrowing breadth” structure. Data from Oriental Finance shows gains concentrated in leading stocks, with market breadth shrinking—indicating clear capital preference: not chasing beta, but favoring companies with visible cash flow, stable dividends, and strong external demand correlation.
Given this setup, Lim focuses on “industry redistribution” rather than the index itself. This round of trade recovery favors upstream and midstream (materials and processing) rather than end consumption and finished goods. Thus, the right strategy is not chasing export stock rallies, but constructing an upstream/midstream long vs. domestic and lower-tier short paired portfolio, maintaining beta neutrality so excess returns come from “rising industry concentration,” not “broad market resonance.”
In earnings trading, he also avoids “single-day gap speculation.” Lim uses a “dual-window approach”: selling volatility before announcements, then observing post-announcement valuation diffusion for sector trends rather than just single-stock opportunities. Earnings reports are not about betting on wins and losses, but pricing industry concentration.
风险提示:本文所述仅代表作者个人观点,不代表 Followme 的官方立场。Followme 不对内容的准确性、完整性或可靠性作出任何保证,对于基于该内容所采取的任何行为,不承担任何责任,除非另有书面明确说明。

暂无评论,立马抢沙发