If “London Advisors” Need TeamViewer, It’s Not Trading, It’s a Takeover

avatar
· 阅读量 449

If “London Advisors” Need TeamViewer, It’s Not Trading, It’s a Takeover

This Philippines call-center raid reads like a classic boiler-room operation upgraded for the internet age: polished accents, scripted “advisers,” early fake profits, then pressure to scale deposits until withdrawals mysteriously become “difficult.” The biggest tell is the remote-access step. No legitimate broker or advisory firm needs TeamViewer to “help you trade,” because the moment you hand over remote control, you’re not investing anymore, you’re giving strangers direct access to your accounts, devices, and identity. The commission-driven floor, whiteboards, and supervisors are also exactly how predatory sales machines run, maximize collections, minimize refunds, and rotate victims across regions. Real trading is boring paperwork, regulated custody, and transparent execution, not secrecy, urgency, and screen-sharing. My rule is simple: if an investment opportunity requires remote access, off-platform transfers, or “verification” that blocks withdrawals, you’re not dealing with markets, you’re dealing with criminals.

风险提示:本文所述仅代表作者个人观点,不代表 Followme 的官方立场。Followme 不对内容的准确性、完整性或可靠性作出任何保证,对于基于该内容所采取的任何行为,不承担任何责任,除非另有书面明确说明。

喜欢的话,赞赏支持一下
回复 0

暂无评论,立马抢沙发

  • tradingContest